Underwater Plains and Valleys: Using Sound to Map Where Marine Life Gathers

Brandyn Lucca – blucca@uw.edu
Bluesky: @brandynlucca.bsky.social‬
Instagram: @brandynmark
Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Henderson Hall (HND), 1013 NE 40th St, Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States

Joseph Warren
Instagram: @warren.bioacoustics.lab
Bluesky: @warren-lab.bsky.social
Affiliation: School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University

Popular version of 2aAO9 – Active acoustic detection of fish and zooplankton along bathymetric features of the New York Bight
Presented at the 188th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037522

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

Imagine standing on the beach in New York City, looking beyond the harbor over the horizon where rolling waves meet an armada of ships lined up to unload their cargo. What remains hidden from view are the vast underwater plains, valleys, and canyons teeming with marine life beneath the surface. From a bird’s-eye view, this area forms the New York Bight, a stretch of ocean off the coast of New York City situated between southern New Jersey and eastern Long Island. This seascape offers prime real estate for animals ranging from copepods to whales.

Some animals often gather along the shelfbreak, where the relatively flat, shallow seafloor of the continental shelf dramatically changes to the deep sea. Others prefer life in a well-known ecological hotspot and one of the largest marine canyons in the world: the Hudson Canyon. Like many people, marine animals choose habitats based on the amenities they offer, but their preferences can evolve as they age or in response to environmental shifts. Some may leave the New York Bight entirely, while others may settle in undiscovered hotspots elsewhere. But how can scientists find these hotspots in the first place?

How do scientists “see” beneath the waves?
Researchers use a technique called “active acoustics” to get snapshots of where animals are in the water column across large areas that can complement other sampling methods like nets. With this approach, they send out short pulses of sound from a moving ship and measure the echoes that bounce back from the seafloor or are created from animals that live in the water column. The equipment scientists use to measure these echoes is similar to bottom-finders and fish-finding systems used by fishers and boaters. The results can reveal dense fish schools clustered along the steep walls of a canyon or zooplankton aggregations in the near-surface waters along the shelfbreak. These patterns help scientists better understand how seascapes shape habitat preferences among marine organisms (Figure 1).

Echograms are one way to visualize acoustic backscatter, with color scale units corresponding to the total energy in echoes measured from marine organisms. This echogram reveals how animals are distributed vertically in the water column along a ship transect that crossed the Hudson Canyon. The dark gray region corresponds to the seafloor.

To carry out this research, scientists measure echoes from animals in the water column, collect fish and zooplankton using nets and trawls, and measure how temperature and salinity (and other environmental factors like oxygen) vary in the ocean as you go down in depth. Researchers collected the data for this study during seasonal surveys aboard a research vessel that covered the waters south of Long Island, New York, out to the shelfbreak, approximately 140 miles away (Figure 2).

Acoustic surveys were conducted along seven transect lines (black lines) with biological and seawater sampling stations at each square point. The white lines represent isobaths, or lines of constant depth, at 25, 50, 100, 500, 100, and 2000 m. The orange and red stars indicate where the Hudson Shelf Valley and Hudson Canyon begin.

Location, location, location: Hotspots change with the seasons
The New York Bight regions with the most fish and zooplankton (as measured by our echosounders) change with the seasons. In winter and early spring, most organisms concentrated farther offshore, often along the canyon edges or beyond the shelfbreak. As summer arrives, these biological hotspots grow along the shelfbreak, especially in and around the canyons, and move closer to shore. By fall, acoustic measurements showed that fish and zooplankton spread more evenly across the continental shelf.

For fish living near the seafloor, a seasonal feature called the Mid-Atlantic Cold Pool plays a major role in their movements. This layer of cold water forms on and above the seafloor over part of the continental shelf each spring and slowly decreases in volume throughout the summer. When the Cold Pool forms, many near-bottom fish shift away from their spatial extent due to the fish having temperature preferences and gather in the Hudson Canyon, other shelfbreak canyons, inshore areas, and the Hudson Shelf Valley. As the Cold Pool shrinks in late summer, their distribution becomes more like the broader patterns observed for overall biological backscatter (Figure 3).

An example echogram of biological backscatter near the shelfbreak. The 9º (gray) and 10º (black) isotherms, or lines of constant temperature, approximate the lateral and vertical extent of the Mid-Atlantic Cold Pool that, in this case, nearly walled this aggregation off from the inshore waters on the continental shelf entirely.

From underwater sound to action: Guiding management decisions
The New York Bight is a dynamic and productive ecosystem that experiences significant fishing pressure, shipping activity, and offshore energy development. By combining acoustic surveys with biological net sampling and oceanographic measurements, scientists can identify areas that fish and zooplankton may prefer (or avoid) throughout the year. Surveys such as this one help guide management decisions that balance the economic and commercial health of the New York Bight.

Coconut Wireless: Understanding endangered Hawaiian false killer whale communication

Brijonnay Madrigal – bcm2@hawaii.edu
Instagram: @brijonnay
Marine Mammal Research Program
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
46-007 Lilipuna Rd
Kaneohe, HI 96744
United States

Marine Mammal Research Program @mmrp_uh

Popular version of 5aAB – Acoustic behavior of endangered false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) using biologging devices in Hawaiʻi
Presented at the 188th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038276

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

Photo Credit: Grace Olson (Pacific Whale Foundation)

How do scientists better understand the communication of individual animals when we don’t know who is speaking and what they are doing underwater? For cetaceans (whales/dolphins/porpoises), passive acoustic monitoring is an important approach to study these animals that spend most of their time underwater and rely on acoustic signaling to communicate. The use of acoustic biologging tags has enabled the collection of high-resolution data to study acoustic behavior of top predators. The Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) insular population of false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) is the most endangered toothed whale population in Hawaiʻi under the Endangered Species Act. Despite ongoing management efforts to address threats, the population has continued to decline to a current population size of less than 150 individuals. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the behavior of this population to better inform conservation measures critical for the protection of this species. Our understanding of the social context of individual false killer whales has generally been limited, until now.

The goal of this study was to use data recorded from non-invasive archival , suction-cup tags, to describe the acoustic behavior of MHI insular false killer whales to better understand the behavioral context of social signals. Our objectives were to (1) classify and characterize the repertoire of individual false killer whales; (2) describe nonlinear features observed in calls that enhance communication between individuals; and (3) analyze the relationship between social sound production and diving behavior. These findings can help us evaluate social context on a small scale and provide foundational information to determine the potential function of these signals.

Our results show that MHI insular false killer whales have a more diverse repertoire than previously described. Some call types are shared between individuals, and some are unique to individuals. We identified predominate call types that are repeated or favored by specific individuals and call rates vary by individual across dive states (for example – descent, ascent) (Figure 1). Most calls are biphonic, where the animals produce a call and clicks simultaneously (Audio 1). Although clicks are commonly used for echolocation to navigate and locate prey, the clicks produced by these animals occur with calls at the same time in distinct patterns, so they likely function in communication and encode additional information for individuals. This study provides invaluable insights into this species’ social behavior and by intercepting the coconut wireless of Hawaiʻi false killer whales using tag technology, our findings can inform management strategies necessary to advance conservation efforts of this top predator to the Hawaiʻi ecosystem.

Figure 1: A spectrogram of three predominate call types produced by one tagged false killer whale from the Main Hawaiian Islands insular population. Calls are biphonic which means a call and clicks are produced simultaneously, as indicated by the arrows in the first panel. A spectrogram is a visual representation of sound with time on the x-axis, frequency (or pitch) on the y-axis, and color representing the relative amplitude (loudness) of the sound.

Figure 1: A spectrogram of three predominate call types produced by one tagged false killer whale from the Main Hawaiian Islands insular population. Calls are biphonic which means a call and clicks are produced simultaneously, as indicated by the arrows in the first panel. A spectrogram is a visual representation of sound with time on the x-axis, frequency (or pitch) on the y-axis, and color representing the relative amplitude (loudness) of the sound.

Image credit: Grace Olson (Pacific Whale Foundation)

Customized animal tracking solutions (CATS) tags audio recording of calls produced by a tagged MHI insular false killer whale.

The Parasaurolophus’ Pipes: Modeling the Dinosaur’s Crest To Study Its Sound #ASA187

The Parasaurolophus’ Pipes: Modeling the Dinosaur’s Crest To Study Its Sound #ASA187

Physical and mathematical models can help replicate the sounds of dinosaurs.

Media Contact:
AIP Media
301-209-3090
media@aip.org

MELVILLE, N.Y., Nov. 21, 2024 – Fossils might give a good image of what dinosaurs looked like, but they can also teach scientists what they sounded like.

The Parasaurolophus is a duck-billed dinosaur with a unique crest that lived 70 million to 80 million years ago. It stood around 16 feet tall and is estimated to have weighed 6,000 to 8,000 pounds.

A 3D-printed model of the Parasaurolophus skulls at a 1:3 scale to the original fossil. The white model is the nasal passages inside the skull. Credit: Hongjun Lin

Hongjun Lin from New York University will present results on the acoustic characteristics of a physical model of the Parasaurolophus’ crest Thursday, Nov. 21, at 4:30 p.m. ET as part of the virtual 187th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, running Nov. 18-22, 2024.

“I’ve been fascinated by giant animals ever since I was a kid. I’d spend hours reading books, watching movies, and imagining what it would be like if dinosaurs were still around today,” said Lin. “It wasn’t until college that I realized the sounds we hear in movies and shows—while mesmerizing—are completely fabricated using sounds from modern animals. That’s when I decided to dive deeper and explore what dinosaurs might have actually sounded like.”

Lin created a physical setup made of tubes to represent a mathematical model that will allow researchers to discover what was happening acoustically inside the Parasaurolophus crest. The physical model, inspired by resonance chambers, was suspended by cotton threads and excited by a small speaker, and a microphone was used to collect frequency data.

While it isn’t a perfect replication of the Parasaurolophus, the pipes—nicknamed the “Linophone,” after the researcher—will serve as a verification of the mathematical framework.

“I wanted something simplified and accessible for both modeling and building a physical device,” Lin explained.

Lin’s initial results indicate that the Parasaurolophus’ crest was used for resonance, similar to the crests of birds we see today. The mathematical model is still in progress, but Lin hopes it will be useful for studying animals with similar vocal structures.

He is also planning to create an accessible plug-in for people to experiment with and even add dinosaur sounds to music.

“Once we have a working model, we’ll move toward using fossil scans,” Lin said. “My ultimate goal is to re-create the sound of the Parasaurolophus.”

———————– MORE MEETING INFORMATION ———————–
​Main Meeting Website: https://acousticalsociety.org/asa-virtual-fall-2024/
Technical Program: https://eppro01.ativ.me/src/EventPilot/php/express/web/planner.php?id=ASAFALL24

ASA PRESS ROOM
In the coming weeks, ASA’s Press Room will be updated with newsworthy stories and the press conference schedule at https://acoustics.org/asa-press-room/.

LAY LANGUAGE PAPERS
ASA will also share dozens of lay language papers about topics covered at the conference. Lay language papers are summaries (300-500 words) of presentations written by scientists for a general audience. They will be accompanied by photos, audio, and video. Learn more at https://acoustics.org/lay-language-papers/.

PRESS REGISTRATION
ASA will grant free registration to credentialed and professional freelance journalists. If you are a reporter and would like to attend the virtual meeting and/or press conferences, contact AIP Media Services at media@aip.org. For urgent requests, AIP staff can also help with setting up interviews and obtaining images, sound clips, or background information.

ABOUT THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
The Acoustical Society of America is the premier international scientific society in acoustics devoted to the science and technology of sound. Its 7,000 members worldwide represent a broad spectrum of the study of acoustics. ASA publications include The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (the world’s leading journal on acoustics), JASA Express Letters, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Acoustics Today magazine, books, and standards on acoustics. The society also holds two major scientific meetings each year. See https://acousticalsociety.org/.

Exploring the Impact of Offshore Wind on Whale Deaths #ASA187

Exploring the Impact of Offshore Wind on Whale Deaths #ASA187

Some experts are worried wind farm survey noise adds stress and increases whale deaths.

Media Contact:
AIP Media
301-209-3090
media@aip.org

MELVILLE, N.Y., Nov. 21, 2024 – In the winter of 2022-2023, nearly a dozen whales died off the coast of New Jersey, near the sites of several proposed wind farms. Their deaths prompted concern that related survey work being conducted in the area somehow contributed to their deaths.

Michael Stocker of Ocean Conservation Research will present his work Thursday, Nov. 21, at 3:29 p.m. ET in a session dedicated to examining the circumstances surrounding these whale deaths, as part of the virtual 187th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, running Nov. 18-22, 2024.

Researchers retrieve an instrument package from the Cook Inlet. Could noise from these surveys like these have led to the death of almost a dozen whales during winter of 2022-2023? Credit: Michael Stocker

In pursuit of clean energy goals and to reduce atmospheric carbon emissions, developers are increasingly exploring building wind turbines in the waters off the East Coast of the United States. Three offshore wind farms are already in operation, with several more planned or underway. These wind farms stand to generate a significant amount of carbon-free electricity, which can help coastal states meet their decarbonization goals.

The increased presence of these turbines in coastal waters, along with the noise from construction and surveys, has led to concerns of their impact on marine life. In particular, cetaceans such as whales and dolphins are likely to be sensitive to the noises and increased marine traffic brought by these turbines.

However, the Marine Mammal Commission, a federal oversight agency, states there is no evidence linking the whales that died in the New Jersey region in the winter of 2022-2023 to wind energy development.

According to necropsies performed on recovered whales, many of them died from collisions with ships. The Marine Mammal Commission notes that this is not a particularly unusual occurrence, nor is the number of whale deaths in this period higher than average. A rise in ship strikes over the last decade is mostly due to a simple combination of more whales plus more ships.

“In the case of a lot of whales, population recoveries since the cessation of commercial whaling are coincident with increasing shipping traffic and increasing fishing efforts,” said Stocker. “This is resulting in increased interactions between whales and the industrialization of the ocean.”

Stocker, however, is concerned that the increased presence of survey ships in and around New Jersey waters may have exacerbated this issue.

“Were the ship strikes just a coincidence?” asked Stocker. “Or were they a product of compromised whale vigilance due to aggregated stress factors?”

Survey ships are employed by wind farm developers to map the seafloor in preparation for construction. These ships use underwater acoustic devices in their efforts, which can stress marine mammals such as whales. While one survey ship likely has little effect, Stocker highlights that 11 different surveys were operating in the region from December 2022 to March 2023, and that the cumulative impact of these surveys has not been properly evaluated.

Stocker hopes his Thursday session will spark a discussion among attendees with the goal of identifying approaches to minimize whale deaths in the future.

———————– MORE MEETING INFORMATION ———————–
​Main Meeting Website: https://acousticalsociety.org/asa-virtual-fall-2024/
Technical Program: https://eppro01.ativ.me/src/EventPilot/php/express/web/planner.php?id=ASAFALL24

ASA PRESS ROOM
In the coming weeks, ASA’s Press Room will be updated with newsworthy stories and the press conference schedule at https://acoustics.org/asa-press-room/.

LAY LANGUAGE PAPERS
ASA will also share dozens of lay language papers about topics covered at the conference. Lay language papers are summaries (300-500 words) of presentations written by scientists for a general audience. They will be accompanied by photos, audio, and video. Learn more at https://acoustics.org/lay-language-papers/.

PRESS REGISTRATION
ASA will grant free registration to credentialed and professional freelance journalists. If you are a reporter and would like to attend the virtual meeting and/or press conferences, contact AIP Media Services at media@aip.org. For urgent requests, AIP staff can also help with setting up interviews and obtaining images, sound clips, or background information.

ABOUT THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
The Acoustical Society of America is the premier international scientific society in acoustics devoted to the science and technology of sound. Its 7,000 members worldwide represent a broad spectrum of the study of acoustics. ASA publications include The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (the world’s leading journal on acoustics), JASA Express Letters, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Acoustics Today magazine, books, and standards on acoustics. The society also holds two major scientific meetings each year. See https://acousticalsociety.org/.

New scientific tools help national parks learn more about wildlife and natural sounds

Cathleen Balantic – cathleen_balantic@nps.gov

Biologist, National Park Service, Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division
1201 Oakridge Drive Suite 100
Fort Collins, CO, 80524, United States

Popular version of 2aAB5 – From sounds to science on public lands: using emerging tools in terrestrial bioacoustics to understand national park soundscapes
Presented at the 186th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0026931

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

In recent decades, audio recordings have helped scientists learn more about wildlife. Natural sounds help answer questions such as: which animals are present or absent from the environment? When do frogs and birds start calling in the spring? How are wildlife reacting to something humans are doing on a landscape?

As audio recordings have become less expensive and easier to collect, scientists can rapidly amass thousands of hours of data. To absorb this volume of data, instead of listening ourselves, we create automated detectors to find animal sounds in the recordings. However, it is a daunting and time-consuming task to create detectors for a diversity of species, habitats, and types of research.

This is a familiar challenge to researchers in the National Park Service Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division. Our division is a national service office that provides scientific expertise and specialized technical assistance to parks, and we need to be prepared to help any of the 400+ national parks that have questions about bioacoustics. Each park has distinct research questions, varied habitats, and different wildlife (Fig. 1, Sound Clip 1).

national parks

Figure 1. Varied Thrush at Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve in 2015. Image courtesy of the National Park Service.

Several bird species vocalize at an acoustic monitoring station at Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, including Pacific Wren, American Robin, and Varied Thrush. This example was recorded on June 13, 2017, at 3:22am local time. Audio recording courtesy of the National Park Service.

As more parks collect audio data to answer pressing research and management questions, building a unique automated detector for a single park project is no longer tenable. Instead, we are adopting emerging technology like BirdNET, a machine learning model trained on thousands of species worldwide (not just birds!). BirdNET provides us with more capacity. Instead of painstakingly building one detector for one project, BirdNET enables us to answer questions across multiple national parks.

But emerging technology poses more questions, too. How do we access these tools? What are the best practices for analyzing and interpreting outputs? How do we adapt new methods to answer many diverse park questions? We don’t all have the answers yet, but now we have code and workflows that help us process terabytes of audio, wrangle millions of rows of output, and produce plots to visualize and explore the data.

We are learning even more by collaborating with other scientists and land managers. So far, we’re exploring avian soundscapes at Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve across a decade of monitoring – from when birds are most vocally active during the spring (Fig.2), to when they are most active during the dawn chorus (Fig. 3). We are learning more about wildlife in the Chihuahuan Desert, wood frogs in Alaska, and how birds respond to simulated beaver structures at Rocky Mountain National Park.

The information we provide and interpret from audio data helps parks understand more about wildlife and actions to protect park resources. Translating huge piles of raw audio data into research insights is still a challenging task, but emerging tools are making it easier.

 

Figure 2. Heat map of BirdNET detection volume for selected focal species at Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve. (a) Hermit Thrush, (b) Pacific-slope Flycatcher, (c) Pacific Wren, (d) Ruby-crowned Kinglet, (e) Townsend’s Warbler, and (f) Varied Thrush. Dates ranging in color from purple to yellow indicate increasing numbers of detections. Dates colored gray had zero detections. White areas show dates where no recordings were collected. Image courtesy of the National Park Service.

 

Figure 3. Heat map of Varied Thrush detections across date and time of day at Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve. Timesteps ranging in color from purple to yellow indicate increasing numbers of detections. Timesteps colored gray had zero detections. White areas show times when no recordings were collected. Audio recordings were scheduled based on sunrise times. Image courtesy of the National Park Service.