151st ASA Meeting, Providence, RI
Quiet, I'm Trying to Learn language!
The Effect of Background Noise on Infants
Rochelle Newman- rnewman@hesp.umd.edu
Dept. of Hearing & Speech Sciences
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Popular version of paper 3aSC22
Presented Wednesday morning, June 7, 2006
151st ASA Meeting, Providence, RI
Cars screech across the TV screen; siblings bicker in another room;
the blender whirrs in the kitchen; and somehow, in the midst of all
the noise, an infant sifts the sound of her own name out of the
tumult and responds.
This environment, typical of modern households, could not be more
different than the quiet laboratory settings in which most research
on how infants learn language has taken place. The present research
examines how the type of background noise influences infants' ability
to understand speech.
The study examined how long a 4.5-month-old child spent listening
when a female voice said either the baby's name or another infant's
name in the presence of background noise. Prior research in quiet
labs has shown that at 4.5 months, babies will listen longer to their
own name than to someone elese's (Mandel, Jusczyk & Pisoni, 1995). We
examined if this would hold true in the midst of different types of
noise.
In particular, we compared a situation akin to a day care (with
multiple people talking in the background) to something more common
in a home setting (with only a single person talking in the
background).
Testing
Infants sat on their caregiver's lap in a three-sided booth. A light
on one of the side panels attracted the infants' attention; once the
infant was looking in that direction, the woman's voice began calling
a name. On some trials, the name was that of the infant being
tested; on other trials, it was the name of a different child. The
woman continued to repeat the name until the baby turned his or her
head away, and we measured the amount of time each infant spent
listening to the different names. In all three cases, the target
woman's voice was 10 decibels louder than the sounds of the other
people talking; this is roughly equivalent to the noise level you
might experience while having a one-on-one conversation at a
reasonably quiet restaurant (one filled with other patrons, but in
which people are speaking softly).
Results
Infants heard the names in the presence of three different types of
noise: a mix of multiple background talkers, a single background
talker, and a single background talker reversed in time (this has the
acoustic properties of a single talker, but doesn't sound like real
speech) ; examples of these sounds are presented below.
When the noise consisted of multiple people speaking at the same
time, infants listened longer to their names than to the names of
other children. However, they only did so when the target speech was
at least 10 dB more intense than the background - a less noisy
situation than that typically found in day care settings (see, for
example, http://www.acoustics.org/pressroom/httpdocs/139th/golden.htm).
Sample 1
Sample 2
But even at this high amplitude level, infants appeared able to
recognize their own name when the background noise blended to a
murmur, but clearly found the task far more difficult when the
background signal was a single voice. This is particularly
surprising, because adult listeners show the exact opposite pattern.
Sample 3
Sample 4
Summary:
The present results suggest that listening in noise is a more
difficult task for infants when the "noise" consists of a single
talker than multiple talkers. Moreover, this was the case even when
the talker was much louder than the background noise.
These findings suggest that children may experience difficulties
listening in many of the settings where they commonly find
themselves. Often, in the home, background noise takes the form of
other voices, and there generally may not be so many other voices
that they blend into background babble. A parent may be talking to
her infant while someone is talking on the phone, or while the other
parent is speaking to a sibling. These situations are much more akin
to the single-voice condition presented here, and the present results
suggest that infants may have a very difficult time understanding
what is said to them in these situations. Moreover, the fact that
adults show just the opposite pattern suggests the possibility that
parents may frequently underestimate the extent of the noise problem
facing their child.
These results imply that noise could interfere with children's
language development, suggesting the need for greater parental
awareness of the noise in their infants' environments.
[ Lay Language Paper Index | Press Room ]
|