Sounding Out Coral Larval Settlements #ASA188

Sounding Out Coral Larval Settlements #ASA188

Coral larvae are attracted to areas with other healthy coral structures, using cues like sound to seek them out.

Media Contact:
AIP Media
301-209-3090
media@aip.org

coral larvae

Natalie Levy, a post-doctoral researcher, counts settled coral larvae with an ultraviolet light on the synthetically coated microhabitat structures. Credit: O. Boulais

NEW ORLEANS, May 22, 2025 – Coral reefs are vital to marine biodiversity, but their livelihood is under threat due to climate instability and the impacts of human activities.

Rehabilitating marine environments requires innovative solutions. Océane Boulais, a doctoral student at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, studies one of these potential solutions: the impacts of acoustics on coral larval recruitment and settlement.

After spawning, coral larvae drift or swim through the water column, seeking suitable sites to find a home to attach to along the ocean floor.

“Multiple chemical compounds have already been identified as environmental cues that stimulate this settling behavior, presumably by indicating to the larvae when other successful-settled coral structures are nearby,” said Boulais. “A growing body of evidence over the past 20 years is also finding that sound may be another such cue.”

Healthy reefs are acoustically rich environments, filled with fish croaks and shrimp snaps. Boulais and their collaborators mimicked these sound environments to study the effects of sounds on 19 artificial coral settlement modules placed in Kāneʻohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. The researchers recorded audio near a vibrant reef, which they replayed at various distances from their artificial microhabitats. The artificial microhabitats were coated with a bacteria designed to induce larval settlement, creating a suitable habitat for attracting coral larvae.

Boulais will present details on their findings about the impacts sound has on coral larvae Thursday, May 22, at 9:20 a.m. CT as part of the joint 188th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and 25th International Congress on Acoustics, running May 18-23. Notably, there were significant increases in coral settlement close to the speakers.

The researchers are planning an additional data deployment in the summer of 2025. Boulais said they hope to ultimately develop scalable strategies to study larger reef structures with audiovisual remote sensing tools, using low-cost cameras for continuously monitoring the reef’s biodiversity.

“Innovative, interdisciplinary approaches — combining science, technology, and creativity — can offer powerful solutions to pressing environmental challenges like coral reef degradation,” Boulais said. “Ultimately, I hope this research inspires both urgency and hope for the future of coral reefs.”

——————— MORE MEETING INFORMATION ———————
Main Meeting Website: https://acousticalsociety.org/new-orleans-2025/
Technical Program: https://eppro01.ativ.me/src/EventPilot/php/express/web/planner.php?id=ASAICA25

ASA PRESS ROOM
In the coming weeks, ASA’s Press Room will be updated with newsworthy stories and the press conference schedule at https://acoustics.org/asa-press-room/.

LAY LANGUAGE PAPERS
ASA will also share dozens of lay language papers about topics covered at the conference. Lay language papers are summaries (300-500 words) of presentations written by scientists for a general audience. They will be accompanied by photos, audio, and video. Learn more at https://acoustics.org/lay-language-papers/.

PRESS REGISTRATION
ASA will grant free registration to credentialed and professional freelance journalists. If you are a reporter and would like to attend the meeting and/or press conferences, contact AIP Media Services at media@aip.org. For urgent requests, AIP staff can also help with setting up interviews and obtaining images, sound clips, or background information.

ABOUT THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
The Acoustical Society of America is the premier international scientific society in acoustics devoted to the science and technology of sound. Its 7,000 members worldwide represent a broad spectrum of the study of acoustics. ASA publications include The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (the world’s leading journal on acoustics), JASA Express Letters, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Acoustics Today magazine, books, and standards on acoustics. The society also holds two major scientific meetings each year. See https://acousticalsociety.org/.

ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR ACOUSTICS
The purpose of the International Commission for Acoustics (ICA) is to promote international development and collaboration in all fields of acoustics including research, development, education, and standardization. ICA’s mission is to be the reference point for the acoustic community, becoming more inclusive and proactive in our global outreach, increasing coordination and support for the growing international interest and activity in acoustics. Learn more at https://www.icacommission.org/.

Can Plants Hear Their Pollinators? #ASA188

Can Plants Hear Their Pollinators? #ASA188

Research suggests pollinator buzzing sounds lead plants to increase their nectar production.

Media Contact:
AIP Media
301-209-3090
media@aip.org

NEW ORLEANS, May 21, 2025 – When pollinators visit flowers, they produce a variety of characteristic sounds, from wing flapping during hovering, to landing and takeoff. However, these sounds are extremely small compared to other vibrations and acoustics of insect life, causing researchers to overlook these insects’ acoustic signals often related to wing and body buzzing.

Francesca Barbero, a professor of zoology at the University of Turin, and her collaborators — an interdisciplinary mix of entomologists, sound engineers, and plant physiologists from Spain and Australia — studied these signals to develop noninvasive and efficient methods for monitoring pollinator communities and their influences on plant biology and ecology.

Barbero will present her findings and their impacts on Wednesday, May 21, at 9 a.m. CT as part of the joint 188th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and 25th International Congress on Acoustics, running May 18-23.

A photo of the recording device, the model snapdragon plant (A. litigiousum), and the approaching bee (R. sticticum). Credit: Vibrant Lab

“Plant-pollinator coevolution has been studied primarily by assessing the production and perception of visual and olfactory cues, even though there is growing evidence that both insects and plants can sense and produce, or transmit, vibroacoustic signals,” said Barbero.

Barbero and her collaborators played recordings near growing snapdragons of the buzzing sounds produced by a Rhodanthidium sticticum bee (sometimes called a snail-shell bee) to monitor the flowers’ reactions. The researchers found that the sounds of bees, which are efficient snapdragon pollinators, led the snapdragons to increase their sugar and nectar volume, and even alter their gene expression that governs sugar transport and nectar production.

The flowers’ response may be a survival and coevolution strategy, especially if the plants can affect the time pollinators spend within their flowers to increase their fidelity.

“The ability to discriminate approaching pollinators based on their distinctive vibroacoustic signals could be an adaptive strategy for plants,” said Barbero. “By replying to their proper vibroacoustic signal — for instance, an efficient pollinator’s — plants could improve their reproductive success if their responses drive modifications in pollinator behavior.”

While it’s clear that buzzing sounds can trigger plants’ responses, it’s less clear whether plant acoustics can also influence insect behavior — for example, whether sounds from plants can draw in a suitable pollinator.

“If this response from insects is confirmed, sounds could be used to treat economically relevant plants and crops, and increase their pollinators’ attraction,” said Barbero.

The team is conducting ongoing analyses comparing snapdragon responses to other pollinators and nectar robbers.

“The multitude of ways plants can perceive both biotic factors — such as beneficial and harmful insects, other neighboring plants — and abiotic cues, like temperature, drought, and wind in their surroundings, is truly astonishing,” Barbero said.

The project, “Good Vibes: How do plants recognise and respond to pollinator vibroacoustic signals?” (grant RGP0003/2022), is funded by the Human Frontier Science Program and is a collaborative effort between the University of Turin, I²SysBio in Valencia, and the Centre for Audio, Acoustics and Vibration at the University of Technology Sydney.

——————— MORE MEETING INFORMATION ———————
Main Meeting Website: https://acousticalsociety.org/new-orleans-2025/
Technical Program: https://eppro01.ativ.me/src/EventPilot/php/express/web/planner.php?id=ASAICA25

ASA PRESS ROOM
In the coming weeks, ASA’s Press Room will be updated with newsworthy stories and the press conference schedule at https://acoustics.org/asa-press-room/.

LAY LANGUAGE PAPERS
ASA will also share dozens of lay language papers about topics covered at the conference. Lay language papers are summaries (300-500 words) of presentations written by scientists for a general audience. They will be accompanied by photos, audio, and video. Learn more at https://acoustics.org/lay-language-papers/.

PRESS REGISTRATION
ASA will grant free registration to credentialed and professional freelance journalists. If you are a reporter and would like to attend the meeting and/or press conferences, contact AIP Media Services at media@aip.org. For urgent requests, AIP staff can also help with setting up interviews and obtaining images, sound clips, or background information.

ABOUT THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
The Acoustical Society of America is the premier international scientific society in acoustics devoted to the science and technology of sound. Its 7,000 members worldwide represent a broad spectrum of the study of acoustics. ASA publications include The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (the world’s leading journal on acoustics), JASA Express Letters, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Acoustics Today magazine, books, and standards on acoustics. The society also holds two major scientific meetings each year. See https://acousticalsociety.org/.

ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR ACOUSTICS
The purpose of the International Commission for Acoustics (ICA) is to promote international development and collaboration in all fields of acoustics including research, development, education, and standardization. ICA’s mission is to be the reference point for the acoustic community, becoming more inclusive and proactive in our global outreach, increasing coordination and support for the growing international interest and activity in acoustics. Learn more at https://www.icacommission.org/.

Sound Highways of the Sea: Mapping Acoustic Corridors for Whales and Fish in Colombia’s Pacific

Maria Paula Rey Baquero – rey_m@javeriana.edu.co
Instagram: @mariapaulareyb
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Fundación Macuáticos Colombia
Bogotá
Colombia

Additional Authors:
Kerri D. Seger
Camilo Andrés Correa Ayram
Natalia Botero Acosta
Maria Angela Echeverry-Galvis

Project Ports, Humpbacks y Sound In Colombia – @physicolombia
Fundación Macuaticos Colombia – @macuaticos
Semillero Aquasistemas – @aquasistemaspuj

Popular version of 4aAB5 – Modeling for acoustical corridors in patchy reef habitats of the Gulf of Tribugá, Colombia
Presented at the 188th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037990

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

Sound plays a fundamental role in marine ecosystems, functioning as an invisible network of “pathways” or corridors that connect habitat patches and enable critical behaviors like migration, communication, and reproduction. In Colombia’s northern Pacific, one of the most biodiverse regions, the Gulf of Tribugá stands out for its pristine soundscape, dominated by the sounds of marine life. Designated a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve and a “Hope Spot” for conservation, this area serves as a vital nursery for humpback whales and supports local livelihoods through ecotourism and artisanal fishing. However, increasing human activities, including boat traffic and climate change, threaten these acoustic habitats, prompting researcher on how sound influences ecological connectivity—the lifeline for marine species’ movement and survival.

This study in Colombia’s Gulf of Tribugá mapped how ocean sounds connect marine life by integrating acoustic data with ecological modeling. Researchers analyzed how sound travels through the marine environment, finding that humpback whale songs (300 Hz) create natural acoustical corridors along coastal areas and rocky islands (‘riscales’). These pathways, though occasionally interrupted by depth variations, appear crucial for whale communication, navigation, and maintaining social connections during migration. In contrast, fish calls (100 Hz) showed no detectable sound corridors, suggesting fish may depend less on acoustic signals or use alternative navigation cues like wave noise when moving between habitats.

Photographs of some of the recorded fish species. Source: Author

The research underscores that acoustical connectivity is species-specific. While humpback whales may depend on sound corridors and prioritize long-distance communication, fish may prioritize short-range communication or other environmental signals. At any distance, noise pollution disrupts these systems universally: The bubbling/popping sounds created by spinning boat propellers, for instance, generate frequencies that can covers up the whale songs and fish calls and degrade habitat quality, even if fish are less affected over the same distances that whales are. Background noise shrinks and breaks up the underwater corridors that marine animals use to communicate and navigate, harming their underwater sound habitat.

Figure 1. Received sound levels when emitted by singers (a) without noise and (b) with background noise, at a grain size of 2 Φ. The left column shows conditions without background noise, and the right column shows conditions with noise. Sound intensities most likely to be heard by a humpback whale at 200 Hz are shown in green, less likely sounds in orange, and inaudible sounds in black. Source: Author

Noise pollution alters behaviors and acoustic corridors humpback whales rely on for communication and navigation in Colombia’s Pacific waters. Notably, the fish species studied showed no sound-dependent movement, suggesting their reliance on other cues. The study advocates for sound-inclusive conservation, proposing that acoustic data (more easily gathered today via satellites, field recordings, and public databases) should join traditional metrics like currents or temperature in marine management. Protecting acoustic corridors could become as vital as safeguarding breeding grounds, especially in biodiverse hubs like Tribugá.

This work marks a first step towards integrated acoustical-ecological models, offering tools to quantify noise impacts and design smarter protections. Future research could refine species-specific sound thresholds or expand to deeper oceanic areas. For now, the message is preserving marine ecosystems requires listening, not just looking. Combining efforts to lessen human noise by using mapped soundscapes to target critical corridors could help in the conservation of marine species.

Locating the lives of blue whales with sound informs conservation

John Ryan – ryjo@mbari.org

Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA, 95039, United States

Popular version of 4aUW7 – Wind-driven movement ecology of blue whales detected by acoustic vector sensing
Presented at the 188th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038108

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

A technology that captures multiple dimensions of underwater sound is revealing how blue whales live, thereby informing whale conservation.

The most massive animal ever to evolve on Earth, the blue whale, needs a lot of food. Finding that food in a vast foraging habitat is challenging, and these giants must travel far and wide in search of it. The searching that leads them to life-sustaining nutrition can also lead them to a life-ending collision with a massive fast-moving ship. To support the recovery of this endangered species, we must understand where and how the whales live, and how human activities intersect with whale lives.

Toward better understanding and protecting blue whales in the California Current ecosystem, an interdisciplinary team of scientists is applying a technology called an acoustic vector sensor. Sitting just above the seafloor, this technology receives the powerful sounds produced by blue whales and quantifies changes in both pressure and particle motion that are caused by the sound waves. The pressure signal reveals the type of sound produced. The particle motion signal points to where the sound originated, thereby providing spatial information on the whales.

A blue whale in the California Current ecosystem. Image Credit: Goldbogen Lab of Stanford University / Duke Marine Robotics and Remote Sensing Lab; NMFS Permit 16111.

For blue whales, it is all about the thrill of the krill. Krill are small-bodied crustaceans that can form massive swarms. Blue whales only eat krill, and they locate swarms to consume krill by the millions (would that be krillions?). Krill form dense swarms in association with cold plumes of water that result from a wind-driven circulation called upwelling. Sensors riding on the backs of blue whales reveal that the whales can track cold plumes precisely and persistently when they are foraging.

The close relationships between upwelling and blue whale movements motivates the hypothesis that the whales move farther offshore when upwelling habitat expands farther offshore, as occurs during years with stronger wind-driven upwelling. We tested this hypothesis by tracking upwelling conditions and blue whale locations over a three-year period. As upwelling doubled over the study period, the percentage of blue whale calls originating from offshore habitat also nearly doubled. A shift in habitat occupancy offshore, where the shipping lanes exist, also brings higher risk of fatal collisions with ships.

However, there is good news for blue whales and other whale species in this region. Reducing ship speeds can greatly reduce the risk of ship-whale collisions. An innovative partnership, Protecting Blue Whales and Blue Skies, has been fostering voluntary speed reductions for large vessels over the last decade. This program has expanded to cover a great stretch of the California coast, and the growing participation of shipping companies is a powerful and welcome contribution to whale conservation.

Coconut Wireless: Understanding endangered Hawaiian false killer whale communication

Brijonnay Madrigal – bcm2@hawaii.edu
Instagram: @brijonnay
Marine Mammal Research Program
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
46-007 Lilipuna Rd
Kaneohe, HI 96744
United States

Marine Mammal Research Program @mmrp_uh

Popular version of 5aAB – Acoustic behavior of endangered false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) using biologging devices in Hawaiʻi
Presented at the 188th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038276

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

Photo Credit: Grace Olson (Pacific Whale Foundation)

How do scientists better understand the communication of individual animals when we don’t know who is speaking and what they are doing underwater? For cetaceans (whales/dolphins/porpoises), passive acoustic monitoring is an important approach to study these animals that spend most of their time underwater and rely on acoustic signaling to communicate. The use of acoustic biologging tags has enabled the collection of high-resolution data to study acoustic behavior of top predators. The Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) insular population of false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) is the most endangered toothed whale population in Hawaiʻi under the Endangered Species Act. Despite ongoing management efforts to address threats, the population has continued to decline to a current population size of less than 150 individuals. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the behavior of this population to better inform conservation measures critical for the protection of this species. Our understanding of the social context of individual false killer whales has generally been limited, until now.

The goal of this study was to use data recorded from non-invasive archival , suction-cup tags, to describe the acoustic behavior of MHI insular false killer whales to better understand the behavioral context of social signals. Our objectives were to (1) classify and characterize the repertoire of individual false killer whales; (2) describe nonlinear features observed in calls that enhance communication between individuals; and (3) analyze the relationship between social sound production and diving behavior. These findings can help us evaluate social context on a small scale and provide foundational information to determine the potential function of these signals.

Our results show that MHI insular false killer whales have a more diverse repertoire than previously described. Some call types are shared between individuals, and some are unique to individuals. We identified predominate call types that are repeated or favored by specific individuals and call rates vary by individual across dive states (for example – descent, ascent) (Figure 1). Most calls are biphonic, where the animals produce a call and clicks simultaneously (Audio 1). Although clicks are commonly used for echolocation to navigate and locate prey, the clicks produced by these animals occur with calls at the same time in distinct patterns, so they likely function in communication and encode additional information for individuals. This study provides invaluable insights into this species’ social behavior and by intercepting the coconut wireless of Hawaiʻi false killer whales using tag technology, our findings can inform management strategies necessary to advance conservation efforts of this top predator to the Hawaiʻi ecosystem.

Figure 1: A spectrogram of three predominate call types produced by one tagged false killer whale from the Main Hawaiian Islands insular population. Calls are biphonic which means a call and clicks are produced simultaneously, as indicated by the arrows in the first panel. A spectrogram is a visual representation of sound with time on the x-axis, frequency (or pitch) on the y-axis, and color representing the relative amplitude (loudness) of the sound.

Figure 1: A spectrogram of three predominate call types produced by one tagged false killer whale from the Main Hawaiian Islands insular population. Calls are biphonic which means a call and clicks are produced simultaneously, as indicated by the arrows in the first panel. A spectrogram is a visual representation of sound with time on the x-axis, frequency (or pitch) on the y-axis, and color representing the relative amplitude (loudness) of the sound.

Image credit: Grace Olson (Pacific Whale Foundation)

Customized animal tracking solutions (CATS) tags audio recording of calls produced by a tagged MHI insular false killer whale.

Underwater Internet of Things: Industrial boon, biological headache

Michael Stocker – mstocker@OCR.org
Bluesky: @ocean-noise.bsky.social
Instagram: @oceanconservationresearch
PO Box 559, Lagunitas, CA, 94938-0559, United States

Popular version of 4aAB9 – Underwater Internet of Things: Industrial boon, biological headache
Presented at the 188th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037992

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

As the technologies of commerce and industry expand out into the sea, so does the need to localize, query, and control these technologies. Due to the challenges of physically accessing underwater equipment, a digital “Underwater Internet of Things” is being developed for marine enterprises.

Due to the opacity of  water to radio frequency electromagnetic energy – which we use for our above water WiFi and Blue Tooth and other communication connections, underwater communication channels predominantly use sound. This is particularly the case as distances between the communication nodes increase.

Seafloor processing equipment for oil and gas extraction equipment (Nautronix illustration)
Seafloor processing equipment for oil and gas extraction equipment (Nautronix illustration)

The efficiency of sound transmission through water has not been lost on evolution; pretty much all marine and aquatic animals use sound to get around. From the simple clicks and grunts of marine invertebrates and fishes, to the complex and beautiful songs of humpback whales. In fact sound transmits so efficiently in water that some whales can project sounds over thousands of kilometers.

The ocean is alive with sound, and marine animals have evolved and adapted to utilize “acoustical niches” appropriate to their particular habitats; dolphins using high-frequency, short wavelength biosonar for near-field echolocation, large whales using low-frequency, long wavelength sounds for long distance communication and navigation. And all the critters in between – fishes, lobsters, krill, and benthic worms, all have their own habitat-adapted sound repertoires.

So herein lies the conflict with the acoustic Underwater Internet of Things (UIoT): The frequencies of the sounds being used to control and query underwater equipment overlaps the various existing bioacoustic communication channels. And while the sheer density of this technological noise threatens to obscure or “mask” important bioacoustic communication channels, the sound qualities of the common digital signals themselves threaten to turn the ocean acoustic environment into a living acoustical nightmare.

Digital communication hinges on unambiguous data states – strings of “ones and zeros” that code into data channels. Acoustically this translates into ripping streams of “noise-not noise” signals. The problem with this in the realm of bioacoustics is that these data streams sound horrible. They are also clearly associated with hearing damage in humans and other animals.

(Samples of some underwater digital communication signals: https://ocr.org/sounds/underwater-communication-signals/?portfolioCats=200%2C201)

This nasty noise problem is exacerbated by the fact that the most useful transmission frequencies for commerce and industry fall in the 1kHz to 50kHz frequency range, which resides in the ‘sweet spot’ for dolphins and porpoises, and overlaps the hearing ranges of most other marine animals.

Working with the International Standards Organization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), we are urging industry to use signals that are less damaging to marine life. This would include “transmit on query only” and synchronized, spread spectrum “frequency hopping” schemes,* and using bio-mimetic signals which would sound more like dolphins or whales and less like giant fingernails scratching across a dirty chalkboard.


* “Spread Spectrum, frequency hopping” technology was patented by 1940s-50s glamour actress Lana Turner. The premise being that the transmitter and the receiver are synchronized over a coded series of transmission channel frequencies. Transmission only occurs at a specific time over a specific frequency channel. In this way the communication channel becomes impervious to noise, so the signal level can be below the ambient noise level. A variation of this technology makes it possible to have millions of cell phones operating in the same radio frequency band without interference.