Using sound to observe the global ocean

Peter Tyack – plt@st-andrews.ac.uk

School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, United Kingdom

Popular version of 3pAO2 – Long-term global ocean observing using sound
Presented at the 189th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://eppro02.ativ.me/appinfo.php?page=Inthtml&project=ASAASJ25&id=3983499%20#ASAASJ25

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

Of all the ways to sense objects in the ocean, sound reaches the furthest. Light seldom travels more than hundreds of meters in the ocean, but sound can travel thousands of kilometers. For example, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) created a network of just 6 hydrophones (underwater microphones) that can detect a nuclear explosion anywhere in the global oceans (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Map of 6 underwater acoustic sensing stations of the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty Organization.
Reproduced with permission from Ainslie, Michael A., et al. “Ocean soundscapes and trends from 2003 to 2021: 10–100 Hz.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157.6 (2025):4358-4384, Figure 1.

Sound can travel so far that listening has long been selected for detecting threats such as submarines, but the ocean carries acoustic signals of wind, waves, rain and sea ice that are important for monitoring climate change, and the sounds of animals vocalizing underwater tell us about their distribution and about the health of marine ecosystems.

Using sound to understand changes in the ocean requires many years of data to sort out changes on daily, seasonal, and longer-term time scales. The CTBTO hydrophone array is one of few sources of such long time series of ocean sound.


Figure 2. Measured and modeled Sound Pressure Level in the 10-40 Hz band from Wake Island in the Pacific Ocean. Reproduced with permission from Robinson, Stephen, et al. “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on levels of deep-ocean acoustic noise.” Scientific Reports13.1 (2023): 4631, Figure 2. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Figure 2 shows 12 years of low frequency acoustic data from the Pacific. The strongest pattern in sound level is annual variation, but you can also see a longer-term pattern of increasing variation from 2010 to 2020.


Figure 3. Expanded view of sound level data from figure 2, here from 2018-2020. Reproduced with permission from Robinson, Stephen, et al. “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on levels of deep-ocean acoustic noise.” Scientific Reports13.1 (2023): 4631, Figure 4. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Analyzing data from before COVID hit in 2020, shown with blue dots in figure 3, makes it possible to estimate what sound levels were expected in 2020 based on earlier years. The data points change color from blue to red once COVID started to affect seagoing activities. You can see that many of the red dots from January to July 2020 are lower than the gray area predicted from pre-COVID data, demonstrating that the reduction in human activities during COVID reduced sound levels around Wake Island.

Excessive sound can also harm wildlife by damaging hearing and by causing stress or disturbance. Recordings from the west coast of the US have shown that increased shipping caused underwater sound energy to more than double each decade from the 1960s to the 1990s. This increase in human-generated ocean noise stimulated concerns about increasing effects of noise on marine life. In June 2025, a coalition of 37 countries declared “ocean noise is intensifying, driven by the ongoing expansion of global shipping activities and development of ocean industries” and formed a high ambition coalition for a quiet ocean (https://www.foraquietocean.org).

Figure 4. Trends in annual mean sound pressure level (SPL) from 2006-2021 at Ascension Island at 5 frequency bands: VLF=9-14 Hz; LF=14-28 Hz, MF=28-56 Hz; HF=56-112 Hz; ADEON B = 9-89 Hz. Reproduced with permission from Ainslie, Michael A., et al. “Ocean soundscapes and trends from 2003 to 2021: 10–100 Hz.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157.6 (2025):4358-4384, Figure 18.

Analysis of CTBTO data from sites around the world document changes in ocean sound after 2000. This century has not seen significant increases in sound pressure level at any of the CTBTO sites. Figure 4 shows the long term decline in sound level in 4 frequency bands from 2006-2021 at Ascension Island in the Atlantic Ocean. A close look at the acoustic record (Figure 5A) shows that airguns used to prospect for offshore oil and gas along the African and South American coasts were a primary source. Figure 5B shows that the best predictor of sound pressure level there in the MF band is the price of Brent Crude Oil. When the price of oil is low, there are fewer surveys. The major sources of sound energy varied between sites and included natural sounds of earthquakes and whales and sounds of human activities such as shipping.


Figure 5. 5A shows a waveform on the top and spectrogram (plot of frequency against time) of a series of pulses from an airgun source recorded from the CTBTO station at Ascension Island. Figure 5B shows how the sound level recorded there correlates with the price of oil. Reproduced with permission from Ainslie, Michael A., et al. “Ocean soundscapes and trends from 2003 to 2021: 10–100 Hz.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157.6 (2025):4358-4384, 5A: Figure 16; 5B Figure 20.

Access to long time series of ocean sound data is critical for understanding how changes in sound sources cause trends in ocean sound. This information is not only critical for estimating indicators of climate change and ocean health, but also for managing the effects of sound. Noise from human activities may not have been increasing ocean sound levels globally in this century, but sound produced by more localized activities and the harm it causes to wildlife needs to be measured and managed.

Over the last 50 years, the integration of global weather data with improved computer models has drastically improved our ability to forecast weather. The applications of ocean sound to measure threats, climate change and ecosystem health are so important that we need similar expansion and improvement of our global ocean sound observation networks so that we can forecast and manage these important applications.

Reducing Underwater Noise When Installing Subsea Structures #ASA188

Reducing Underwater Noise When Installing Subsea Structures #ASA188

Constructing offshore windfarms is loud and disruptive to marine life.

Media Contact:
AIP Media
301-209-3090
media@aip.org

NEW ORLEANS, May 20, 2025 – Offshore wind farms have the potential for large impacts on clean energy generation, as wind speeds are higher at sea than on land. However, this benefit comes at a high cost for marine life, which can suffer greatly during the installation of offshore wind foundations.

Junfei Li, from Purdue University, will present work on mitigating the noise pollution during monopile offshore wind farm installation Tuesday, May 20, at 1:00 p.m. CT as part of the joint 188th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and 25th International Congress on Acoustics, running May 18-23.

underwater noise

This metamaterial structure is made to reduce the noise pollution from undersea monopile foundation construction. Credit: Junfei Li

“To build offshore wind farms, monopile foundations are commonly driven into the seabed with hydraulic impact hammers, generating strong noises that propagate 50 kilometers or more from the installation site, potentially inducing auditory injury and behavioral change in marine species,” said Li.

These deep foundations are crucial for physically supporting wind farms — and other structures — above the sea. Most current mitigation techniques are limited by high energy demands or challenges with transportation and deployment.

Li and his colleagues instead developed a metamaterial comprising of carefully arranged plates that trap air within and act as guides for the sound. With their metamaterial in place, sound from monopile installation can be reduced by 40 decibels, an improvement over the 25-decibel reduction of other methods. The material is modular and foldable, making its transport and deployment easy and inexpensive.

Li said the sounds created during these processes have wide-reaching impacts.

“The high-intensity, impulsive noise generated by pile driving has the potential to affect a range of wildlife — including marine and freshwater fish, sea turtles, and marine mammals,” said Li. “It may lead to a range of behavioral changes in marine mammals and may lead to auditory or physical injury in some species of fish.”

The researchers hope to scale up their technology for deployment in future offshore wind far constructions, as well as for monopiles used in bridge construction and oil drilling platforms.

“Human-generated underwater noise is a critical — yet often hidden — environmental stressor. It’s not just background sound; it actively harms marine life, affecting their ability to survive and thrive,” said Li. “We must acknowledge the severity of our acoustic impact on the underwater world and work toward reducing it.”

——————— MORE MEETING INFORMATION ———————
Main Meeting Website: https://acousticalsociety.org/new-orleans-2025/
Technical Program: https://eppro01.ativ.me/src/EventPilot/php/express/web/planner.php?id=ASAICA25

ASA PRESS ROOM
In the coming weeks, ASA’s Press Room will be updated with newsworthy stories and the press conference schedule at https://acoustics.org/asa-press-room/.

LAY LANGUAGE PAPERS
ASA will also share dozens of lay language papers about topics covered at the conference. Lay language papers are summaries (300-500 words) of presentations written by scientists for a general audience. They will be accompanied by photos, audio, and video. Learn more at https://acoustics.org/lay-language-papers/.

PRESS REGISTRATION
ASA will grant free registration to credentialed and professional freelance journalists. If you are a reporter and would like to attend the meeting and/or press conferences, contact AIP Media Services at media@aip.org. For urgent requests, AIP staff can also help with setting up interviews and obtaining images, sound clips, or background information.

ABOUT THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
The Acoustical Society of America is the premier international scientific society in acoustics devoted to the science and technology of sound. Its 7,000 members worldwide represent a broad spectrum of the study of acoustics. ASA publications include The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (the world’s leading journal on acoustics), JASA Express Letters, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Acoustics Today magazine, books, and standards on acoustics. The society also holds two major scientific meetings each year. See https://acousticalsociety.org/.

ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR ACOUSTICS
The purpose of the International Commission for Acoustics (ICA) is to promote international development and collaboration in all fields of acoustics including research, development, education, and standardization. ICA’s mission is to be the reference point for the acoustic community, becoming more inclusive and proactive in our global outreach, increasing coordination and support for the growing international interest and activity in acoustics. Learn more at https://www.icacommission.org/.

Reducing Ship Noise Pollution with Structured Quarter-Wavelength Resonators

Mathis Vulliez – mathis.vulliez@usherbrooke.ca

Université de Sherbrooke, Département de génie mécanique, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada

Marc-André Guy, Département de génie mécanique, Université de Sherbrooke
Kamal Kesour, Innovation Maritime, Rimouski, QC, Canada
Jean-Christophe G.Marquis, Innovation Maritime, Rimouski, QC, Canada
Giuseppe Catapane, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Giuseppe Petrone, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Olivier Robin, Département de génie mécanique, Université de Sherbrooke

Popular version of 1pEA6 – Use of metamaterials to reduce underwater noise generated by ship machinery
Presented at the 186th ASA Meeting
Read the abstract at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0026790

–The research described in this Acoustics Lay Language Paper may not have yet been peer reviewed–

The underwater noise generated by maritime traffic is the most significant source of ocean noise pollution. This pollution threatens marine biodiversity, from large marine mammals to invertebrates. At low speeds, the machinery dominates the underwater radiated noise from vessels. It also has a precise sound signature since it usually operates at a fixed rotation frequency. If you think of it, an idling vehicle produces a tonal acoustic excitation. The sound energy distribution is mainly concentrated at a few precise frequencies and multiples. Indeed, the engine rotates at a given rotation speed – in round per minutes – or frequency (divided by 60, it is the number of oscillations per second). In addition to the rotating frequency, the firing order and the number of cylinders will lead to the generation of excitation multiples of the rotating frequency. The problem is that the produced frequencies are generally low and difficult to mitigate with classical soundproofing materials requiring substantial material thickness.

This research project delves into new solutions to mitigate underwater noise pollution using innovative noise control technologies. The solution investigated in this work is structured quarter-wavelength acoustic resonators. These resonators usually absorb sound at a resonant frequency and odd harmonics, making them ideal for targeting precise frequencies and their multiples. However, the length of these resources is dictated by the wavelength corresponding to the target frequency. As for the required material thickness, this wavelength is significant at low frequencies (in air, for a frequency of 100 Hz and a speed of sound of 340 m/s, the wavelength is 3.4 m since the wavelength is the ratio of speed by frequency). The length of a quarter wavelength resonator tuned at 100 Hz is thus 0.85 m.

Fig.1. Comparison between classical and innovative soundproofing material on sound absorption, from Centre de recherche acoustique-signal-humain, Université de Sherbrooke.

Therefore, a coiled quarter wavelength resonator was considered to reduce its bulkiness, and facilitate their installation. The inspiration follows Archimedes’ spiral geometry shape, a structure easily manufactured using today’s 3D printing technologies. Experimental laboratory tests were conducted to characterize the prototypes and determine their effectiveness in absorbing sound. We also created a numerical model that allows us to quickly answer optimization questions and study the efficiency of a hybrid solution: a rock wool panel with embedded coiled resonators. We aim to combine classic and innovative solutions tom propose low weight and compact solutions to efficiently reduce underwater noise pollution!

Fig.2. Numerical model of coiled resonators embedded in rockwool, from Centre de recherche acoustique-signal-humain, Université de Sherbrooke.