3aBA9 – Ultrasound mediated thermal stress augments mass and drug transport in brain tumors

Costas Arvanitis
Georgia Institute of Technology
costas.arvanitis@gatech.edu

Popular version of paper 3aBA9 The role of U.S. thermal stress in modulating the vascular transport dynamics in the brain tumors
Presented Thursday morning, June 10, 2021
180th ASA Meeting, Acoustics in Focus

Local hyperthermia and stimuli-responsive delivery systems, such as thermosensitive liposomes, represent promising strategies to locally enhance drug delivery in brain tumors and improve treatment outcomes. However, a critical obstacle towards exploring their therapeutic potential in brain tumors is the limited ability to attain reliably and reproducibly the desired temperature in the brain.

Dr Costas Arvanitis at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, and his graduate student, Chulyong Kim, hypothesized that trans-skull focused ultrasound combined with closed-loop controlled methods can achieve this goal.

brain tumors
Figure 1. Graphical representation of  US mediated  thermal stress drug release and delivery from  thermosensitive drugs in brain tumors.

Almost!
Attaining controlled thermal stress through the skull is not a trivial problem, especially in mice where every new treatment is tested for safety and efficacy. For example, although at low frequencies (< 1 MHz) most of the energy is transmitted through the skull, the resulting large focal region overlaps substantially with the skull, which due to its higher absorption leads to disproportionally high skull heating. On the other hand, at higher frequencies (> 2 MHz) skull reflections and aberrations become significant, and thus limit our ability to focus the beam in the brain through the skull. Using a physically accurate mathematical modeling, the investigations revealed that an optimal frequency (≈ 1.7 MHz) does exist for applying localized thermal stress in mice brain without overheating the skull.

Based on this knowledge, the investigators built a closed-loop trans-skull magnetic resonance imaging guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) prototype and demonstrated that it can attain reproducible experimentation and heating of the entire tumor at the desired temperature. Next, using semi-quantitative imaging, they revealed that localized thermal stress (41.5 oC for 10 minutes) in brain tumors in rodents promotes acute changes in the cerebrovascular transport dynamics in the brain tumor microenvironment. These changes can be important, as they can increase the amount of drug that reaches the tumor.

Subsequently, by combining the abilities of this system with those of thermosensitive liposomes loaded with doxorubicin, the most common chemotherapeutic agent, they were able to achieve a marked improvement in doxorubicin accumulation and uptake in preclinical glioma tumor models. Crucially, survival studies indicated that the proposed two-pronged strategy could lead to substantial improvement in the survival.

Overall, this work, in addition to refining our understanding on the role of thermal stress in modulating the transport dynamics in the brain tumor microenvironment, allowed to establish a new paradigm for noninvasive targeted drug delivery in glioblastomas. It may, thus, create new opportunities towards attaining clinically effective drug delivery in patients with aggressive brain tumors, such as glioblastoma, that currently have limited treatment options.

Acknowledgments: This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R00 EB016971.

Links: https://arvanitis.gatech.edu/

2pMU3 – Why do harpists still prefer gut strings?

Jim Woodhouse — jw12@cam.ac.uk
Cambridge University Engineering Department
Trumpington St
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.

Nicolas Lynch-Aird — lynchaird@yahoo.co.uk
The Old Forge
Burnt House Lane
Battisford
Suffolk IP14 2ND, U.K.

Popular version of paper ‘2pMU3’ String choice: Why do harpists still prefer gut?
Presented Wednesday afternoon, June 9, 2021
180th ASA Meeting, Acoustics in Focus

Classical guitarists have all abandoned traditional gut strings in favour of nylon, but harpists still prefer gut.  Why is this? A study of the various limits on string choice for musical instruments has shown that the answer lies in a difference of “damping” in the strings, which is responsible for a difference in brightness of the sound.

When choosing a string for an instrument, the player knows the string length and the frequency it will be tuned to: their task is to choose the material and the diameter. The various different constraints on that choice can be summarised in a chart: a schematic version is shown here.

strings

Schematic chart for choosing strings for musical instruments

The length and the frequency multiplied together defines the position on the horizontal axis. The player’s choice then consists of moving along a vertical line through that point, to choose a string diameter. They need to make a choice within the blue region, otherwise something will go wrong.  The exact shape and position of this blue region depends on the choice of string material.

Obviously the string must not break. There are also upper and lower limits on the tension: if a string is too slack or too tight, it feels wrong to the player.  Less obviously, the choice must lie beneath the dashed line labelled “damping too high”, otherwise the sound will become a dull thud rather than a ringing musical tone. This is where the harp differs from the guitar.  Guitar strings stay well clear of the dashed line, but for the longer, lower-pitched strings of a harp, players want to use strings with very high tension so that the “feel” is right. But that pushes them towards the dashed line, and it is this damping limit that defines the practical limit on string choice. When the detailed charts are compared for nylon and  gut strings, the dashed line is higher for gut. That gives a bit more “headroom” for the player’s choice, and allows them to choose a string that feels good under the fingers, while still having a satisfyingly bright and ringing tone.

Protected: SCA Export

Password Protected

To view this protected post, enter the password below:

2021 SCA Entries

Password Protected

To view this protected post, enter the password below:

Science Communication Award 2017-2018

Science Communication Award 2017-2018

Category 1 (Long format):
Quincy Whitney for
American Luthier: Carleen Hutchins–the Art and Science of the Violin,”
published in Acoustics Today

Category 2 (Short format non-member):
Dallas Taylor and Kevin Edds for the episode
20,000 dBs Under the Sea
of their podcast, “Twenty Thousand Hertz”

Category 3 (Short format ASA member):
Noel Hanna for
Explainer: Why the human voice is so versatile,
published at TheConversation.com